So, I have been playing Before the Storm deluxe edition on my brand-new Xbox One X. Is it better than the first game “Life is Strange”? I would not say so. Its not as comical for starters and it supposedly only have 3 episodes, not counting the bonus episode that you get from the deluxe version. In this game you play as Chloe Price, who has a new voice actor in this game doing the talking. Even though I prefer Chloe’s old voice, the current one does a superb job as well. Chloe was in the first game, but more as a side-kick to Max, sort of. The first game “Life is Strange” is what happens after “Before the Storm”. In the first game Chloe has blue dyed hair, which has not happened so far in this prequel. She still has brown hair after that I finished episode 2. I wonder how and when she is going to dye it. She will probably do it in the last upcoming episode, 3, or, in the bonus episode. It’s really only a minor detail it would seem. But somehow, I have a keen sense that it will be an important part of the story when she dyes it. Of course, I could be wrong, one of the reasons she dyed it because of reading manga. But then again far from everyone that reads manga dyes their hair blue because of it. Why is this even interesting? I just happen to think so; the important parts of an investigation are the details after all.
This game isn’t that humorous, but, it has an interesting story. It is entertaining, sure. I mean it’s not like there are no jokes and no humor. It’s just that the humor is low level and kind of masked into the gameplay. For instance, assuming you made the choices I made, Chloe gets to perform on a theater stage. While you are preparing for the play in the dressing room you are supposed to read and memorize a script of what Chloe is going to say in the drama. The underlined funny part is that you can smoke weed before you go up on stage. At least I found that funny. In a real-world scenario that may not be so fun, which is understandable. Something else which is noticeable compared to the first game is that most choices seems somewhat meaningless. Most “crucial” choices don’t seem as severe as they do in the first game. However, that may be somewhat good considering that you can’t go back in time to change the stuff you do in this game. You can however if you want, go back to a previous checkpoint in the game in case it hasn’t automatically saved the game before you do so. Counting in all the elements this is a good game, despite my criticism mentioned here. There is a clearly outlined red thread that binds together the story well. And as always, I recommend playing these kinds of story games on a TV. Maybe I happened to recommend that because I’m used to playing computer games on a laptop. Laptops aren’t exactly game friendly by definition.
söndag 3 december 2017
måndag 16 oktober 2017
Game review: F-Zero
I played this game, and managed to beat it when I was a kid.
My bro had a SNES which I could play it on. On those days tube tv’s was still in
use and no such thing as flat existed. The first thing you hear when playing
this game is the epic main menu 16-bit music theme. Now why is this game great?
You get to choose a futuristic racing car and see its stats on a chart. The chart animates
the cars top speed as well as acceleration on it. Science on an old-school racing
game, wow.
The game itself is fun to play with both varying maps as
well as music. Some games even today insist on playing the same melody over and
over, but already back then they understood the importance of music in games.
The game levels gradually increase in difficulty as you beat them. This provides
you with a challenge that you can beat. Personally, I don’t like no-challenge games.
If a game is not challenging it is usually not good. Something that the game
sort of requires unless you go with the car with the highest top-speed is
that you must on a level use a “boost” to fly over an obstacle to beat the
track. You only have a certain amount of lives and if they run out you loose
and have to re-play everything. This “boost” is not easy to know about and you must
discover how to use it yourself unless you are able to have and read a manual,
in English, while not being English or maybe not even able to read to begin
with. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
Since I didn’t know about the “booster” thingy until some time, I had no option
but to beat the game with the only ship that could jump over the super long obstacle
without using a boost. However, this pink ship also has a low acceleration
speed, but really, the top-speed makes up for that anyways. In my opinion the
low acceleration super top-speed pink ship might be the best ship anyways. My first
favorite space ship was the yellow one though, maybe because of its many “rockets”
on its back. It also has the highest acceleration which is cool.
The levels in the game are well planned and made, the AI is
the AI (it works), the game is challenging (many obstacles that can damage you,
even bumping into enemy AI can damage you). Different race tracks with
in-racing line options while racing (different paths to take). Cool animations and
sound effects. I am planning to make a game like F-Zero, maybe not as good
music-wise, but, probably good fun-wise.
And if you wonder how a SNES looks like, here it is:
lördag 7 oktober 2017
Half Robot on MS store
So as I have mentioning in earlier posts, here and here, I have worked on a platformer PC game. Just recently I released it which can be found at the Microsoft store here: https://www.microsoft.com/sv-se/store/p/half-robot/9p93l2bhq7jx
The game is sort of similiar to MegaMan 1. Some differences are that my game is much shorter, has less monsters and much less content in general than the original game. But... it is still worth trying out the game. (You can try it for free for 24 hours). Its worth trying out because its pretty challanging. Its not like the everyday buy to win or spam commercials games. In fact its actually addictive I've been told. So go ahead and download it now if you have windows 10. Microsoft has already made sure that it doesnt contain any viruses.
The game is sort of similiar to MegaMan 1. Some differences are that my game is much shorter, has less monsters and much less content in general than the original game. But... it is still worth trying out the game. (You can try it for free for 24 hours). Its worth trying out because its pretty challanging. Its not like the everyday buy to win or spam commercials games. In fact its actually addictive I've been told. So go ahead and download it now if you have windows 10. Microsoft has already made sure that it doesnt contain any viruses.
måndag 7 augusti 2017
Game review: Professor Layton vs. Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney
This game is a merge of two game series, Professor Layton
and Phoenix Wright. It’s a sort of collaboration where puzzles and exploration
is made like in the Layton games and evidence gathering and court trials are
held like in the Ace Attorney games. The two companies who made the game,
Level-5 and Capcom chose to bring in their own main game characters. You get to
play as Professor Layton and some kid companion of his and Phoenix Wright
together who is paired up with a female companion. The female companion is also
somewhat young, but not a kid. Shortly into the game everyone is transported
into a medieval world full of magic and witches. Normally in Ace Attorney you
get to have trials in a world where stuff like fingerprints and normal criminal
forensics exists. In this game however, people are reasoning like if they lived
in the 13th century and magic existed. This leads to the fact that
you get to be the defense attorney for witches. And when you argue in court you
need to reason given certain spells and such things. So, you get to use logic
in a world where supposedly ‘magic’ can cause stuff to happen. On the professor’s
side, you get to solve cool puzzles. I think the game may be a bit too easy on
people not being able to solve the puzzles. You can namely spend coins to
unlock hints for the puzzles. As far as I can remember the puzzles were fine in
the game. It’s a bit ridiculous that the assistant to the Professor has such a
friendly personality. You keep hearing 24/7 in the game that the assistant is a
“gentleman in training”. Supposedly that should mean that he is not a gentleman,
but trying to be? If not, then why would he be training, unless it means that
most people besides him are not a gentleman and he is just boasting nonstop.
But you get used to that nonsense as you play the game. When you have played a
few hours, and heard the sentence “a gentleman in training” a thousand times your
brain will finally go with it and not care.
Should you get this game? Yes. It is very funny, challenging,
easy if you use hints and it has an interesting story/plot. Do not read YouTube
comments or whatever for this game, or else someone will probably spoil the
story. The catch is that you need a Nintendo 3DS or DS to play it. I borrowed a
3DS, and I also borrowed the game. I should consider getting a 3DS if they are
to make a sequel or if I’m going to play one of the new Ace Attorney games. Is
this game worth getting a 3DS for? I guess it might be if you have cash. You could
just sell the 3DS when you’re finished with the game…
In the courtroom, the judge believes in magic and have no
clue about modern forensic evidence like fingerprints. But he is possible to
persuade using rational thought and logic. Even if the evidence is 100% based
on magic spells and magical wands. As long as there are rules, the rules can be
used to come to conclusions and prove which conclusions are correct. The
witnesses are goofy and whatnot. They will lie and cheat, so it is your job to
make that clear for everyone. In fact, you will see many suspicious characters
everywhere in this game which is something to take note of. This game is one of
the reasons, or perhaps the main reason, that I also recently bought “Layton’s
Mystery Journey” that I also blogged about. I haven’t really played that game a
lot yet, but I felt that the puzzles in this game “Professor Layton vs Ace
Attorney” had better and more challenging puzzles overall. But yeah, the mix of
puzzles and court trials in a magical world was top notch. Get this game.
söndag 6 augusti 2017
Game review: Lifeline (recycling old post)
A long time ago I made a post on another blog called the
boring blog. I haven’t really made many posts at all on that blog. I did make
one game review however that I would like to recycle by copy-pasting it into
this blog. It is written in a bit of a jokingly manner so read with
caution:
Ok so this page is about gaming ON. A. PHONE.
The evolution of gaming has really taken a turn for the
worse! awesome. However, every week Apple launches a "free app of the
week" and sometimes that free app is a fun game... or a terrible children’s
app with no imagination.
The latest free app of the week I got was called
"Lifeline" and is a story (visual novel) game where you get to make
binary choices from time to time, but instead of having a yes or no button
there is sentences on the buttons instead of just "yes" and
"no". It seems to be written by someone either pretending to be young
or really is young. The character in the game is called "Taylor".
Taylor is stranded on a moon in outer space. He was a student that won a
lottery ticket and got to board some random spaceship that later on crashed on
a moon. That pretty much sums up the introduction of the story line.
So in this game you make yes or no.... err I mean complex
decisions that affects whether or not Taylor finds a way out of the moon and
other moral issues. I died on my first try, and I slayed one of the people you
had an opportunity to save (by accident of course). My impression of the game
was that you run into various obstacles and then Taylor starts to whine about
how difficult it is, that he can’t do it, its physically impossible etc. and
you have to press the "do it anyway" button a hundred times. If you
DONT press the right button one hundred times it only takes on click for Taylor
to do something else. This was kind of an issue for me at first because I didn’t
fully realize this, but when I did the game got a bit easier. And Taylors
anxiety is very contagious. There are even some attempts to break the 4th wall
in the game but not very successful ones imo. The game was quite good overall although
a not very professionally written story, however the user interface was
excellently, sorry if that isn’t a real word, made. What I really think made it
look space-ish was that there’s like a graphically constructed glass overlay
above the text so it looks like you’re looking at a monitor on a spaceship. I
give this game 4 out of 5. I even got myself the sequel called "Silent
Night" for approx. 1 dollar. The original game is better though. The game
is unfortunately no longer free but it was sort of fun so I recommend getting
it.
Game review: Layton’s Mystery Journey
I recently started playing Layton’s Mystery Journey due to
having a positive experience of another game that partially included the same
game concept. That game was called "Professor Layton vs. Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney". I may do a review of that other game soon. I have just begun
playing this game and is far from finished playing it. In the game, you get to
have some form of case given to you and your agency that you are to solve. As
far as I have experienced it yet, you don’t really need to do anything but
talking to people and travel to destinations pointed out for you on a minimap
and the game eventually tells you that the case is solved. So not much problem
solving in that perspective but that’s not why I bought the game. Btw I got the
game for iOS. Furthermore, the game is childish, or at least kid-friendly. The
game has mentioned a murder at one point so it being children-friendly or not
depends on how sensitive you are. The game is rated age 4+. The game universe
takes place in a jolly good ol’ place called London where everyone is really
friendly. Just like in real life, friendly and outgoing Londoners, right? Not that
I have ever been to London, but I can imagen that it may not be like that in
real life. It being kid-friendly is somewhat part of the game concept I would
guess however. Another thing I noticed playing on the phone is that
conversation text is a bit small, I would like the text font to be bigger. It is
readable but still a bit of a nuisance. Besides just having a too small text
font it gets worse by the fact that the story is so far from action oriented
you can get. No explosions or horrors or anything thrilling at all. So, in my
view the reading conversations and following up with the story is not all that
interesting in my view. Probably a very subjective thing if you like a story or
not. The reason I got this game is because that this game has something
surprisingly no other game tends to focus on. This game has puzzles, well-made
ones, that required thinking to be solved. Some of the times at least,
absolutely not always… Sometimes the ‘puzzle’ blurs into being a riddle
perhaps.
What I can say about the puzzles in this particular game is
that they have been OKish. Most puzzles have been way too easy to solve. This
may be due to the fact that this game isn’t for adults? Some puzzles are harder
though. What annoys me is that sometimes I get the impression that the answer
to a puzzle is wrong, or that the instructions for a puzzle lack information or
explains it wrongly. To give an example, one small puzzle with two options went
like this: “Which path should you choose given this road sign if you want to
avoid traffic? One path is always busy so everyone taking this road choses the
quiet path. Chose the quiet or the busy path.”. My reasoning for solving this
riddle was that given the instructions the busy path is always busy. We do not
know how many other cars go through the path we are currently at besides us. Given
the instructions we know that one path is always busy, and the other path may
have a chance of being quiet. Therefore, I reasoned that the quiet path had the
highest (or only chance) of actually being quiet. The answer was that you can
never rely on an old road-sign to tell you if a path is busy or not. Then
it also said that everyone chose the quiet path so it would be very busy and no
one would take the busy path so it would be free of traffic because of it. I could comment
on many things here, but what annoyed me is that I got the impression that the instructions
implied or said that the busy path was always busy and not that the “old” road
sign said it. Also, while choosing an option to submit as a result, there was a
picture of the “old” road sign. All that was on the picture was a sign with two
arrows with the names of the given paths. I have learned in this game to never
trust the images. The images are very misleading and have made me try to reason
given what I have seen being displayed on the image of a puzzle. On another occasion,
the artwork for a puzzle showed digital numbers. So, I thought that I was to
solve the puzzle given the numbers being showed on the image. It was later that
I discovered that the digital numbers being displayed on the image were
supposed to be “off”, i.e. not showing. When the puzzle was solved another
image was showed with the digital numbers being lit as if the machines having
the digital numbers were “on”. I must be honest though. If I had been smarter
and understood the instructions better I could have arrived at the correct
result by myself. You can spend “coins” in the game to use hints to help you
solve a puzzle. After using many hints, I managed to solve this puzzle. The
puzzle was good, it’s just that I was misled by the image and didn’t understand
the problem sufficiently.
I guess the game is OK in general. Maybe a bit too happy and
not so problem filled so far for my taste. Something that I haven’t mentioned
that this game also has showed some anime clips that also were a bit long.
Anime clips being long in a game is good in my opinion. Usually I have found
them to be very short. There’s also tons of artwork in this game if you like
that. They have focused on making pretty drawings. The characters in game are
ugly/goofy or childish though. The puzzles are okay but sometimes a bit too
easy.
tisdag 1 augusti 2017
Game review: Ace Attorney: Dual Destinies

In Ace Attorney you follow up with certain characters who
are attorneys in the same agency. These people are named Phoenix Wright (age 33),
Apollo Justice (age 23-25) and Athena Cykes (age 18). Phoenix Wright also has a
‘daughter’ Trucy Wright (age 15-16). Athena Cykes is a ‘new’ character in this
game has supposedly just recently finished her education as an attorney and
earned her badge. Due to her young age, most people don’t believe at first
sight that she’s an attorney. As an
attorney in the Wright agency, you get to defend clients in court. Defending in
court is the main part of the game. Usually before you end up in court however
you get to investigate a crime scene and interview various individuals before
the court starts. This is very important in order to gather evidence (you can’t
skip this anyway, but still very important nonetheless) and to get some idea(s)
of how things looks like regarding the current case. When you are in court you
get to listen to either the defendants or some witnesses’ testimonies. When
that is done their testimony is split into pieces which you can press the person
being cross-examined for further information. 90% of the time your job is to
check what evidence you have available to you and present one such evidence to
the part of a testimony that contradicts the given evidence. If you get it
wrong you get a so-called penalty by the judge. Too many penalties and you lose
the game. This isn’t really a problem because the game lets you just continue
back from where you left if choose to do so.
What is different about this game is that you need to think
and figure things out before you can make progress. You need to listen to what
is being said and be able to work out what is correct and what is contradictory
yourself. Often testimonies and evidence change or is added which means that
you must rethink everything that you once thought were correct. This is a very
common occurrence in this game unless your Einstein and can figure out what
happened before the trial begins.
The game is well made, like many Japanese stuff. You get to
watch anime clips every once and a while. Watching clips helps you to get a
mental image of the story, and it is also entertaining. All attorneys have a
special power. This power can be used to help you during tough times in court
or when investigating. Phoenix can untangle mind locks, Apollo can sense
twitches as a reaction to a lie or an uncertainty and Athena can hear emotions.
In court, you get to use Athena’s power to find contradictions between a testimony
and the emotions being felt. All in all I found this game fun to play and
hopefully I also learned a thing or two about debating and objectivity. This
game is worth the money. If your still hesitant getting the game moneywise, you
can buy one episode at a time. The first episode is also the cheapest.
It’s kind of hard to talk about what happens in the game
without spoiling the story. There is a red thread spinning across most episodes
in the game which is good. It makes you want to investigate more and keep
playing new episodes. What I can say is that the bonus episode is sort of
weirdly both not connected to previous episodes as well as a little bit
connected at the same time. I guess they wanted to keep some stuff as obvious
without spoiling the story in the game. Or, the bonus episode just takes place
in some sort of strange time period in between the normal episodes. I liked the
bonus episode but the normal ones were a bit more exciting.
Prenumerera på:
Inlägg (Atom)